Co-production and conservation physiology : outcomes, challenges and opportunities arising from reflections on diverse co-produced projects
| dc.contributor.author | Cooke, Steven J. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Bett, Nolan N. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Hinch, Scott G. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Adolph, Chief Bonnie | |
| dc.contributor.author | Hasler, Caleb T. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Howell, Bradley E. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Schoen, Alexandra N. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Mullen, Eric J. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Fangue, Nann A. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Todgham, Anne E. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Cheung, Melanie J. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Johnson, Rachel C. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Olstad, Rebekah Sze-Tung | |
| dc.contributor.author | Sisk, Marine | |
| dc.contributor.author | Sisk, Chief Caleen | |
| dc.contributor.author | Franklin, Craig E. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Irwin, Robert C. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Irwin, Terri R. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Lewandrowski, Wolfgang | |
| dc.contributor.author | Tudor, Emily P. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ajduk, Hayden | |
| dc.contributor.author | Tomlinson, Sean | |
| dc.contributor.author | Stevens, Jason C. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Wilcox, Alana A.E. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Giacinti, Jolene A. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Provencher, Jennifer F. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Dupuis-Smith, Reyd | |
| dc.contributor.author | Dwyer-Samuel, Frederic | |
| dc.contributor.author | Saunders, Michelle | |
| dc.contributor.author | Meyer, Leith Carl Rodney | |
| dc.contributor.author | Buss, Peter | |
| dc.contributor.author | Rummer, Jodie L. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Bard, Brittany | |
| dc.contributor.author | Fuller, Andrea | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-10-30T09:11:04Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-10-30T09:11:04Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-07 | |
| dc.description | DATA AVAILABILITY : This is a perspective article and although this is based on various empirical studies, those data are published in the original source and here we discuss the process by which that research was conducted. As such, no data are provided here and readers are encouraged to consult the papers cited in each case study. | |
| dc.description.abstract | As a relatively nascent discipline, conservation physiology has struggled to deliver science that is relevant to decision-makers or directly useful to practitioners. A growing body of literature has revealed that co-produced research is more likely to generate knowledge that is not only relevant, but that is also embraced and actionable. Co-production broadly involves conducting research collaboratively, inclusively, and in a respectful and engaged manner—spanning all stages from identifying research needs to study design, data collection, interpretation and application. This approach aims to create actionable science and deliver meaningful benefits to all partners involved. Knowledge can be co-produced with practitioners/managers working for regulators or stewardship bodies, Indigenous communities and governments, industry (e.g. fishers, foresters, farmers) and other relevant actors. Using diverse case studies spanning issues, taxa and regions from around the globe, we explore examples of co-produced research related to conservation physiology. In doing so, we highlight benefits and challenges while also identifying lessons for others considering such an approach. Although co-production cannot guarantee the ultimate success of a project, for applied research (such as what conservation physiology purports to deliver), embracing co-production is increasingly regarded as the single-most important approach for generating actionable science to inform conservation. In that sense, the conservation physiology community would be more impactful and relevant if it became commonplace to embrace co-production as demonstrated by the case studies presented here. LAY SUMMARY This article aims to highlight successful applications of co-production within the realm of conservation physiology. Relying on the diverse experiences of co-authors, we also offer guidance to those embracing co-production in their conservation physiology projects. | |
| dc.description.department | Paraclinical Sciences | |
| dc.description.department | Centre for Veterinary Wildlife Studies | |
| dc.description.librarian | hj2025 | |
| dc.description.sdg | SDG-15: Life on land | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | This work was supported by the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Genome Canada, Manitoba Habitat Heritage Corporation and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Steven J. Cooke, Nolan N. Bett, Scott G. Hinch, Chief Bonnie Adolph, Caleb T. Hasler, Bradley E. Howell, Alexandra N. Schoen, Eric J. Mullen, Nann A. Fangue, Anne E. Todgham, Melanie J. Cheung, Rachel C. Johnson, Rebekah Sze-Tung Olstad, Marine Sisk, Chief Caleen Sisk, Craig E. Franklin, Robert C. Irwin, Terri R. Irwin, Wolfgang Lewandrowski, Emily P. Tudor, Hayden Ajduk, Sean Tomlinson, Jason C. Stevens, Alana A.E. Wilcox, Jolene A. Giacinti, Jennifer F. Provencher, Reyd Dupuis-Smith, Frédéric Dwyer-Samuel, Michelle Saunders, Leith C.R. Meyer, Peter Buss, Jodie L. Rummer, Brittany Bard, Andrea Fuller, Co-production and conservation physiology: outcomes, challenges and opportunities arising from reflections on diverse co-produced projects, Conservation Physiology, Volume 13, Issue 1, 2025, coaf049, pp. 1-18, https://doi.org/10.1093/conphys/coaf049. | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2051-1434 (online) | |
| dc.identifier.other | 10.1093/conphys/coaf049 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2263/105047 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Oxford University Press | |
| dc.rights | © 2025, © The Author(s) 2025. Published by Oxford University Press and the Society for Experimental Biology. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. | |
| dc.subject | Case study | |
| dc.subject | Collaboration | |
| dc.subject | Conservation physiology | |
| dc.subject | Co-production | |
| dc.subject | Government | |
| dc.subject | Indigenous knowledge | |
| dc.subject | Management | |
| dc.title | Co-production and conservation physiology : outcomes, challenges and opportunities arising from reflections on diverse co-produced projects | |
| dc.type | Article |
